| Beth - "Here I... 的个人资料His Dominion - Temporary...照片日志列表 | 帮助 |
His Dominion - Temporary Home of RIOTI'm gonna be a History Maker in this Land! <beth@theriotlive.com>
8月4日 Unbiased Media?I just received the email below and felt it was important enough to pass on. Please read the CTV article mentioned http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070803/against_pride_flag_080803/20070803?hub=TopStories
and note the mindsets that are expressed in the article... i.e. that not being willing to endorse the gay lifestyle means you are a homophobe or "backward thinking" ("council's ban makes the whole town look discriminatory and backward-thinking"), that this is "a sign of homophobia in a government that should be secular" (when they say "secular" what they're trying to imply is that supporting gay rights is being "unbiased" or "neutral", the reality is just the opposite, they are trying to force THEIR morals on us) and that the gay rights activists are portrayed as victims that have been wronged ("the rejection made them feel ostracized and unwelcome"). Maybe your reaction is "What can I do about this?" I'm here to tell you there ARE things you can do:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
The Mayor of Truro, Nova Scotia has refused to fly a homosexual flag at City Hall for a "pride event" in the name of his Christian Values. He is obviously getting a lot of flak. Please write the Mayor an email and congratulate him for standing up for family values: It does not have to be long-- just a short paragraph is sufficient. Then go to the CTV website and click on "feedback" at the bottom of the story. Tell CTV the story was biased-- they did not have one citizen in the story to say that the mayor did the right thing-- and that in a small community in Nova Scotia. That's not believeable. Please write the mayor. The Mayor will probably need this ammunition. If you have a blog, please blog about it. Please spread this to as many people as possible. 7月28日 On the Table: Age of Protection and Anti-Spanking BillsThe following are two opinion pieces I wrote regarding two hot issues that were currently on the table in the Sentate when it adjourned for the summer. Theses are serious issues that deserve some real thought as to their long-term consequences.
---------------
RE: Bill C-22 (Raising the Age of Sexual Protection)
Is our government’s current legislation giving sexual freedom to Canadian youth, or taking away any chance they have for protection and justice? Bill C-22, a bill to raise the age of sexual protection from fourteen to sixteen, was passed by the House of Commons and was in the Senate before it adjourned. As a twenty-one-year-old Canadian, I would like to voice my concerns.
I have a sister who is fourteen. Tragically, because we live in Canada, this means that any man, whether twenty or fifty, could seduce, molest, and have sex with her without fear of legal consequences. The possibility that this could happen to a fourteen or fifteen-year-old boy or girl sickens and disturbs me. Doesn't it seem wrong for people to be able to have sex with our young teens and walk away unpunished?
The UN has declared anyone under eighteen to be a minor, therefore, the message our current legislation is sending is “it is perfectly acceptable for adults to have sex with children.” This message is being received loud and clear by those who would take advantage of our sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters. Canada has made itself a veritable haven for pedophiles and child molesters.
I must admit I do not understand the motivations of those who are fighting to keep the age of protection low. While they may be trying to bestow freedom on our youth, in reality they are leaving them vulnerable to sexual predators. Please… can’t we do everything in our power to protect the next generation of Canadians from sexual exploitation? I trust that the Senate will respect the decision of the House of Commons, as the public's representatives in our democracy, and pass Bill C-22 with expedience once it reconvenes in the fall. ------------------- RE: Bill S-207 (Anti-Spanking Bill) As a young Canadian who will likely be one of Canada's future parents, I would like to share my thoughts on Bill S-207, which would criminalize spanking in Canada. This bill was in committee before the Senate adjourned.
To be honest, I find the totalitarian slant to this bill rather disturbing. In a 2002 poll, 72% of Canadians said they wanted to retain the right to choose spanking as a form of discipline. This is not an issue regarding abuse, but rather whether parents will be allowed the option to use reasonable physical force as a tool to discipline their children, or whether the federal government will make this decision for them. Canadian children are already protected from abuse in the name of “punishment” by child welfare laws.
Bill S-207 raises valid concerns about the government's trust in its citizens to make choices for the well-being of their children. My parents used spanking responsibly. Far from being abuse, if anything I am better for it. I find I have a more positive attitude toward my parents and authorities in general than most of my peers, an attitude we need to foster in youth for the health of our society. A study in Sweden linked banning spanking with a rise in violence, and a New Zealand study concluded that spanking does not produce aggression or anti-social behaviour later in life.
Protection of children as vulnerable citizens is extremely important. However, since children are protected from physical abuse in the Criminal Code of Canada, I sincerely hope the government will uphold democracy by respecting the majority. It is in our country's best interest for the federal government to leave the decision of how to discipline where it belongs: with individual moms and dads, who know their children best. 7月10日 O Canada - UnabridgedCheck it out! The additional verses to our national anthem. My way of saying "Happy Belated Birthday Canada!"
6月6日 News-Flashes of HopeVictory in the House: Child protection bill passes 3rd reading; age of consent for sex to lower from 16 to 14A historic victory has recently been won for the cause of morality in Canada. Our current legislation in Canada allows adults to have sex with 14 and 15 year olds without fear of legal repercussions. In what could arguably be one of the clearest and most successful piece of socially conservative legislation in the past decade, Bill C-22, introduced by pro-family MP’s of the new Conservative government, not only provides protection for Canada’s 14 and 15 year olds from sexual exploitation, it sets a precedent that will no doubt pave the way for future pro-morality legislation and demonstrates a shift from the kind of liberal legislation that has made Canada a haven for sexual predators and promiscuity.However, the intent of this bill came very close to being distorted, when in its early stages an amendment was introduced by Liberal MP Joe Comartin, under the influence of homosexual activists, to use this bill to lower the age of consent for anal sex from 18 to 16. Fortunately, MY Canada (www.4mycanada.ca), led by Faytene Kryskow, went on the offensive and not only testified in favour of this bill to protect young teens, but also vehemently opposed the anal sex amendment and encouraged their membership to contact their MP’s as well as Mr. Comartin and other members of the justice committee to voice their opinions. Their hard work paid off, as the anal sex amendment was dropped. This bill passed in the House of Commons on May 27, 2007, and is now in the Senate. It must approved by the Senate before it will officially become law. Please call or email members of our Senate to encourage them to support this bill. You can get contact information for Senators at www.parl.gc.ca or by calling 1 (866) 599-4999.
Canada Apologizes to the WorldAn online initiative led by the Canada Family Action Coalition (CFAC) seeks to apologize to the world for the negative example Canada has set by changing the definition of marriage. This apology, in the form of an online petition, was launched in April 2007 and is signed by a number of prominent pro-famiy organizations including: REAL Women of Canada; United Mothers, Fathers & Friends; Dawn Stefanowicz (author); and MY Canada. The letter of apology begins: “To the world’s leaders and people, We, the people of Canada who support marriage solely as the union of a man and a woman, apologize to the people of the world for harm done through Canada’s legalization of homosexual marriage. We are grieved and troubled as we consider the impact this is having in weakening the fundamental institution of marriage in countries and cultures around the world.” The letter goes on to discourage the assumption that Canada’s decision was made carefully and judiciously and to encourage other countries to take warning from Canada’s mistake. To personally endorse this apology, visit www.restoremarriagecanada.ca.
World’s Pro-Family Leaders Meet in PolandOn May 22, 2007, several thousand pro-family delegates from around the world gathered in Warsaw, Poland, for the World Congress of Families. In the fourth historic gathering of its kind, the delegates shared strategies for promoting marriage and family in the face of disturbing moral and demographic decline in the developed world. “There are problems within families and we have to really take a hard look at that and not just say ‘yeah rah rah, family!’ but we also have to fix those things,” says Paul Dilion of the World Development Coalition. They discussed everything from tax breaks for families to resisting pressure from myth-spreading population control groups. James Maina, a politician from Kenya, told the congress that his country is facing this kind of pressure due to aggressive campaigns by the United Nations and population control groups, which try to sell their anti-life/anti-family policies as “progressive”. “The stuff that is coming from the United Nations is meant to destroy the family - things like homosexuality and abortion. We are also getting a lot of that pressure to have to legalize these things,” said Maina. This kind of monumental gathering is an encouragement to us all that the cause of traditional marriage and family is alive and thriving, not only in Canada, but around the world, and that we have many allies in our fight. 3月23日 I'm Newly CalibratedI'm absolutely pumped after the Conservative Party's Political Training Conference in Toronto and rally with Prime Minister Stephen Harper. They really seem to be taking their job seriously, to make a difference for Canada, and get the most bang for the taxpayer's buck.
Check out PM Harper's "theme song" from the rally: Better Now
I love it! This song really represents well where the party's come from, where it's at now, and where it's going. Such a sense of hope, excitement, and anticipation in its new popularity and position.
However, it remains true, espcially now in light of a potential majority Conservative government in the next federal election, that "absolute power corrupts absolutely". We need moral people full of integrity to get involved in the party and "keep it honest." We have to keep asking questions and not simply take everything at face value (which I'm tempted to do).
Check this out: Question Authority |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|